From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: 65cfd00613d3a7367643a22e352adbf3e7190095d0791390230f98a30a3af8e4
Message ID: <199701272217.OAA08800@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-27 22:17:52 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 14:17:52 -0800 (PST)
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 14:17:52 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: libsln.htm -- Is Libel a Crime?
Message-ID: <199701272217.OAA08800@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 01:14 AM 1/27/97 -0600, ichudov@algebra.com wrote:
>I am not sure if you posted this information in response to my request
>to cite a statute that would prove that libel is a crime.
>
>Me> Jim Choate wrote:
>Me> >
>Me> >
>Me> >
>Me> > Are you aware that attributing statements in print to a party when that
>Me> > party did not write them is a crime?
>Me>
>Me> cite the statute
>
>
>These postings do not prove that libel is a crime. It is because libel
>is not a crime. Libel is a tort, and unlike with crime, the government
>cannot initiate a legal action against someone for libel. Only injured
>(libeled) individuals and not the government can sue in a libel case.
On the contrary, in some jurisdictions libel is indeed a crime. However,
that doesn't mean that prosecutions happen anymore, but the laws are (in
some places) still on the books.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to January 1997
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”