From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: “Timothy C. May” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 7f512c4aabcb843a718ff9efade592fe6ad8c47b3e312f1910c6fc485aff9cba
Message ID: <199701050110.RAA10132@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-05 01:10:29 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 17:10:29 -0800 (PST)
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Jan 1997 17:10:29 -0800 (PST)
To: "Timothy C. May" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Timmy's Lost It: [Was Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice]
Message-ID: <199701050110.RAA10132@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:15 AM 1/3/97 -0800, Timothy C. May wrote:
>As for my "elitism," I've never presented myself in any other fashion. I've
>discussed this issue many times. Get used to it, or ignore it, or just keep
>foaming at the mouth and ranting about how I need to take "yellow pills" to
>avoid being an ally of "Bubba."
I don't fault you for being "elitist." However, Rich Graves was right: I
think that cryptoanarchy, while obviously eliminating taxation and income
redistribution sounds cozy for economic elites, actually also eliminates the
basis for those elites to be formed in the first place. To cite just one
example that will hit close to home for you, without copyrights or patents (which
are, obviously, monopolies enforced by governments) it would be far harder
for companies such as Intel to maintain a near-monopoly on the
DOS-compatible microprocessor market.
And it has long been observed in libertarian discussion circles that far
from hating regulation, most large (American; and others) corporations
actually receive a net benefit from it as compared with smaller companies:
The cost of complying with regulations doesn't increase linearly with the
size of company, which means that those same regulations are a way of
fighting competition if they are played right. Bring in crypto-anarchy and
this effect is no longer operating.
Despite all this, I still see nothing inconsistent in even an "elitist"
pushing for crypto-anarchy: The current political system has become so
dramatically inefficient and keeps so many people (through welfare,
Socialist Insecurity, and government employment) well-fed through income
redistribution, that I think finally even an "elitist" would be happy to
chuck the whole system and adopt a crypto-anarchy-equalized system.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to January 1997
Return to ““Timothy C. May” <tcmay@got.net>”