1996-02-11 - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)
Header Data
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Message Hash: 8fecae6235f44020bce9abae746706efadfbcab9222f12f40c3217f755078558
Message ID: <m0tlT1P-0008zzC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-11 07:24:50 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 15:24:50 +0800
Raw message
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 1996 15:24:50 +0800
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)
Message-ID: <m0tlT1P-0008zzC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 05:01 PM 2/9/96 EDT, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
> Whoops. I didn't mean to send that one to the list (re: ethics of
>assasination). Sorry. I am still trying to decide on whether other discussions
>of the non-Crypto aspects of Assasination Politics are appropriate; I would
>appreciate mail back from Perry in response to my email to him.
> Sorry again,
> -Allen
If Perry is REALLY sincere about objecting to the NON-crypto part of AsPol,
he should demonstrate this by writing notes which are focussing on the
crypto aspects, rather than just complaining.
Jim Bell
Thread
Return to February 1996
- Return to “Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>”
- Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”
- 1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 15:24:50 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 16:48:11 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - Alex Strasheim <cp@proust.suba.com>
- 1996-02-12 (Mon, 12 Feb 1996 22:25:54 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>