1996-02-12 - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: 854c54d7b0ab13094f4887d75fec42e659a8f02d3f72c723959d36c574aa61b1
Message ID: <199602121333.IAA18580@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <m0tlT1P-0008zzC@pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-12 14:25:54 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 22:25:54 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 1996 22:25:54 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <m0tlT1P-0008zzC@pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <199602121333.IAA18580@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



jim bell writes:
> If Perry is REALLY sincere about objecting to the NON-crypto part of AsPol,
> he should demonstrate this by writing notes which are focussing on the
> crypto aspects, rather than just complaining.

Frankly, Jim, the only reason I haven't torn apart all the utterly
ennervated simulacra of arguments you have posted to support your
"concepts" is that they are *all* off topic and I do not participated
in the discussion of off topic postings.

That does not, however, mean that I don't agree with the people who
think you are a loon, which is apparently a nearly universal
opinion.

Consider what I'm about to do kinder than using bets to encourage
someone to put a bullet in your brain, which is apparently your way of
solving all the world's problems.

PLONK.

Perry





Thread