From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Decius <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a6eda5f54aec66052c465f807fd82af7a4d577d00b39b0519c9e8aa9a5d071a9
Message ID: <m0tjhAS-0008zxC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-07 07:08:05 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 15:08:05 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 1996 15:08:05 +0800
To: Decius <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Why am I wrong?
Message-ID: <m0tjhAS-0008zxC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 09:54 PM 2/5/96 -0500, Decius wrote:
>I am posting this pondering to cypherpunks in hopes that it will be refuted.
[stuff deleted]
>
> Crypto-Absolutism
> decius@ninja.techwood.org
[more stuff deleted]
> On the other hand, we have the crypto-anarchists. They believe
>that the existence of anonymous transactions will naturally lend itself
>to a situation where everyone is anonymous, no transaction can be
>tracked, no communications can be monitored, and basically, no
>government can possibly control the transactions and interactions of its
>citizens. They support the broad use of military grade cryptography and
>anominity. Let no message be crackable or traceable. This, also, is an
>absolute belief and it is also flawed. We have governments for a
>reason, we came together and founded societies for protection, and if
>we tore apart our current social structure and created an anarchy,
>people would immediately form small societies for their own fiscal
>protection. Creating an anarchy is a massive step backward in social
>development, not a step forward. Furthermore, PEOPLE WANT TO BE
>ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS.
<sigh> Well, I suppose that if there is anyone who is most opposed to the
opinion you expressed in the paragraph above, it is myself.
I believe:
1. Governments will no longer be "necessary," if they ever were.
2. Protection will no longer depend on having a "government."
3. Anonymous networking technology will protect our rights, to the extent
they can be protected.
4. Your statement, "...anarchy is a massive step backward..." is absolutely
incorrect.
Note for the others: I am forwarding this person a copy of my essay.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMRb5FfqHVDBboB2dAQFvlQP/Wmsc0OLvEowD3rQ2Rvu2UDcg34ovQt/S
g5HDiraykfk8SpBxyYDWlq+EEO21GssY0w9wmOaf0PKGwk81gZsqqccVpXpJq2Ha
H+ABrgmzCEkiMnL6anFs2RGkZZrlwB2ZGityvV0YZ8HvpP1Ek1Xj0ZD97hYMmYBz
P3gxGE2VCEQ=
=nhzg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to February 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-02-07 (Wed, 7 Feb 1996 15:08:05 +0800) - Re: Why am I wrong? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>