From: Paul Kanz <paul@icx.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: da1b2b16aa22296273a06f8d8ea41a68001c13fd939ec7b8bcfe59ae4f2a2ea9
Message ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960202090112.25583A-100000@pat2.icx.com>
Reply To: <m0tiGg6-0008zpC@pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-02 18:20:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 02:20:59 +0800
From: Paul Kanz <paul@icx.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 1996 02:20:59 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Charter of PDX Cpunk meetings
In-Reply-To: <m0tiGg6-0008zpC@pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.HPP.3.91.960202090112.25583A-100000@pat2.icx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Now, hold on here. I was at the meeting and I don't know what you are
referring to as "highly unethical behavior", could you expand this
for myself and others.
As for "FOR: I've received commentary which suggests that they believe that
key-signing somehow vouches for the HONESTY of the person involved; not his
IDENTITY." Unless I'm in the minority, the key-signing process IS NOT a test
to determine if the person is a 'honest' person, but to ensure that the keys
where valid and that someone did not make a mistake somewhere.
Keep in mind that the meeting was a mixer, not a board of directors meeting -
take a chill pill.
-Paul
On Fri, 2 Feb 1996, jim bell wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
> At 10:52 PM 2/1/96 -0800, Alan Olsen wrote:
>
> >
> >I requested that this debate be taken to private e-mail. Since you seem to
> >not want to do that, and since you insist of making false and unrealistic
> >claims,
>
> Which "false and unrealistic claims"?
>
>
> I am removing your name from the subscription list for
> >pdx-cypherpunks.
>
> This isn't a DEBATE. It is a WARNING to all other potential suckers in the
> Portland Oregon area that Alan Olsen engaged in highly unethical behavior
> with regards to the recent cypherpunks meeting, flamed me without
> justification in the national list, failed to respond to security inquiries,
> failed to deny issues and matters of truth, and failed to properly deal with
> a situation that he had a responsibility to handle ethically. Not to
> mention lying in the comment above.
>
> I am going to take this to the national list, because you took it there
> first in your original flame: I am going to point out that you flamed me
> for no good reason; you engaged in a "knee-jerk" "debunking" without even
> knowing what you were ostensibly "debunking," that you failed to respond to
> my polite request for clarification; that you've attempted to pretend that I
> was somehow at fault for noticing your transgressions; that your local
> clique is pre-programmed to defend you in the face of your transgressions.
> I notice that some of them don't even know what a key-signing meeting is
> FOR: I've received commentary which suggests that they believe that
> key-signing somehow vouches for the HONESTY of the person involved; not his
> IDENTITY.
>
> Until you start responding substantively to legitimate complaints, that is
> all you deserve. The public needs to be warned about people like you.
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: 2.6.2
>
> iQCVAwUBMRHIE/qHVDBboB2dAQHHMAQAkTFZaMMF6asl79yU8RSkd5O0zYElg9so
> syuonRR1UnrzTGlQ2cT/8GPZhuV/IIBSiroxu7EwCX6ASR6BTRUGVdTWbN3l27Vi
> M6FRiduXpBvzpIzQ7XOzwcvPv0D/bLXwXPGHzmUzqsk3chWpsskKw1PKZun7wCKL
> fG2MVim+Vqk=
> =Di2Q
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
______________________________________________________________________________
Paul Kanz
System Administrator
Interconnectix, Inc.
10220 SW Nimbus Ave, Building K4
Portland, OR 97223
Email: paul@icx.com
Phone: 503.684.6641
Fax: 503.639.3469
______________________________________________________________________________
Return to February 1996
Return to “Paul Kanz <paul@icx.com>”