1996-12-28 - Re: RUL_let

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Brad Dolan <shamrock@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 6e949e7b998e7b3f637f1d37700cf6e77f7ee86e8437ee8a7665bddf5c3c2fa4
Message ID: <199612280102.RAA25495@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-12-28 01:02:43 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 17:02:43 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 1996 17:02:43 -0800 (PST)
To: Brad Dolan <shamrock@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: RUL_let
Message-ID: <199612280102.RAA25495@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 12:15 AM 12/27/96 -0500, Brad Dolan wrote:
>On Thu, 26 Dec 1996, Lucky Green wrote:
>
>> At 08:11 PM 12/26/96 -0500, John Young wrote:
>> >
>> >"New encryption export rules probably won't be issued until early 
>> >next week" 
>> >
>> >   Rules probably won't be issued until just a day or 2 before they 
>> >   go into effect on January 1, officials said Monday.
>> 
>> Good move on part of the USG. It will keep public discussion to a minimum.
>> 
> 
>An acquaintance of mine moved here from Germany after the war.
>She says that, from her family's perspective, the first clear sign
>that things were seriously going to hell was that Hitler and his
>friends started issuing proclamations, effective almost immediately,
>dictating something else you could or could not do.  Later, the
>proclamations were made during the night and were effective instantly.


Sounds like "government regulations" today, doesn't it!


Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com





Thread