1996-01-15 - Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?

Header Data

From: SINCLAIR DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
To: jimbell@pacifier.com (jim bell)
Message Hash: afd8e8c73aba6fcefccce147254a31b3043e1926e9342b0d69fde1718bf71704
Message ID: <96Jan15.080404edt.1578@cannon.ecf.toronto.edu>
Reply To: <m0tbe6z-00091JC@pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-15 13:04:21 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 15 Jan 96 05:04:21 PST

Raw message

From: SINCLAIR  DOUGLAS N <sinclai@ecf.toronto.edu>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 96 05:04:21 PST
To: jimbell@pacifier.com (jim bell)
Subject: Re: Respect for privacy != Re: exposure=deterence?
In-Reply-To: <m0tbe6z-00091JC@pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <96Jan15.080404edt.1578@cannon.ecf.toronto.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> What _I_ meant was that government employees deserve NO privacy, if for no 
> other reason than that they've accepted tax dollars stolen from taxpayers.

I am a Canadian student, so my education is largely funded by the state
using stolen money.  Do I deserve privacy?  Do people receiving welfare
deserve privacy?

~ Let him who is without sin cast the first stone ~




Thread