From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 38f9f9ee994ee4f65a00551a4c91da10ec8d50a05cc6abc59941f7f93db0f154
Message ID: <199606210424.VAA28106@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-21 17:18:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 01:18:40 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 01:18:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: NWLibs> Stop Cross-Copying (Re: Take the money, Harry, re.)
Message-ID: <199606210424.VAA28106@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 07:14 PM 6/20/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
>At 5:19 PM 6/20/96, RogErick@aol.com wrote:
>
>> I agree with you, Tonie, as usual.
>> I struggled with this, for years, until I had a dream. I was on a
>>battlefield, pinned down by enemy fire, and I was out of ammunition.
>....
>
>
>Hey, folks, I'm a libertarian, and even voted for John Hospers in 1972. But
>the Cypherpunks mailing list has over 1200 subscribers, and cross-copying
>to it for these debates is not a good idea. I presume the same is true
>about cross-copying Cypherpunks stuff onto "nwlibertarians@teleport.co,"
>but I can't say for sure.
>
>What I know is that wide cross-posting (or cross-copying) is the bane of
>lists these days. There are so many lists, so much overlap, that the
>temptation is great to cc: any conceivably-related list.
>
>Hey, no one speaks for Cypherpunks, least of all me, but I think
>cross-copying between libertarian, or digital commerce, or Wobbly, or
>International Socialist Women of Color, or Unabomber Brigade mailing lists
>to the Cypherpunks list is inappropriate.
The subject was the use of digital cash for accepting Federal matching
funds. I cross-posted ONE message. It was appropriately on-topic in both areas.
Okay?
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to June 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-06-21 (Sat, 22 Jun 1996 01:18:40 +0800) - Re: NWLibs> Stop Cross-Copying (Re: Take the money, Harry, re.) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>