From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 12:02:09 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation
In-Reply-To: <199606212219.PAA15671@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960621181926.3961D-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Fri, 21 Jun 1996, jim bell wrote:

> At 05:03 PM 6/21/96 -0400, Black Unicorn wrote:
> >On Fri, 21 Jun 1996, jim bell wrote:
> >> Since "everybody" is supposed to agree that the Leahy encryption bill is 
> >> dead, dead, dead, I don't see this as being any kind of problem.  It was 
> >> disliked by Clinton and the Denning-types, and with the exception of a short 
> >> flurry of mistaken optimism around here, it was roundly excoriated here as 
> >> well.  
> >
> >To which which Leahy Bill are you referring?
> 
> The one introduced on February 26, 1996.

I think the above message was refering to "procode" however.

> Jim Bell
> jimbell@pacifier.com
> 

---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed,       potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him."    in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55  E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com