From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Adam philipp <adam@rosa.com>
Message Hash: d19aa7341a9a97dfd1f686d46e11bc74183ebd7d9a3eef27dfbdfaf89c290be5
Message ID: <m0u3BoG-0008ynC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-31 07:00:31 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 15:00:31 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 1996 15:00:31 +0800
To: Adam philipp <adam@rosa.com>
Subject: Re: The limits of my patience. (suggested solution)
Message-ID: <m0u3BoG-0008ynC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 03:29 PM 3/30/96 -0800, Adam philipp wrote:
>At 09:48 AM 3/30/96 -0800, you wrote:
>>At 08:43 AM 3/30/96 -0500, Black Unicorn wrote:
>>>On Fri, 29 Mar 1996, jim bell wrote:
>>>> Explains a lot! You _are_ paid for this. In an earlier era, you would
>>>> have gladly run the ovens at Auschwitz if you'd gotten paid for it.
>>>You're way out of line here.
>>>I expect an apology.
>>And as a form of protest, I recommend that you refuse to post any more
>>messages to CP until you get it! That would solve a lot of problems, I think.
>
>An apology was warranted. This is not a flaming ground.
It is also not the place for people like this Unicorn to waste our time with non-responsive messages. If you don't know what I'm referring to, go back and re-read what I posted to him, and what he posted to me in "response." You'll discover that he doesn't address my commentary appreciably, and certainly not reliably. He's wasting your time, and mine, and if you haven't complained to him so far then you have no business complaining to me.
Put him to his proof; challenge his assumptions.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to March 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-03-31 (Sun, 31 Mar 1996 15:00:31 +0800) - Re: The limits of my patience. (suggested solution) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>