From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks)
Message Hash: 42bc18bec576c20b134515f58f51ac13e182b8c0fd48962e33fe99877c3fbd31
Message ID: <199702030110.TAA24381@manifold.algebra.com>
Reply To: <199702022225.OAA03364@toad.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-03 01:14:54 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 17:14:54 -0800 (PST)
From: ichudov@algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home)
Date: Sun, 2 Feb 1997 17:14:54 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com (Cypherpunks)
Subject: Re: If guilty of a lesser crime, you can be sentenced for a greater
In-Reply-To: <199702022225.OAA03364@toad.com>
Message-ID: <199702030110.TAA24381@manifold.algebra.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
jim bell wrote:
>
> Better yet, set up a system to encourage the public to USE those guns (and
> other weapons) to get rid of the people who pass such laws, and the problem
> is solved.
>
How about this scenario: I borrow 1 million dollars from, let's say,
Phill Hallam-Baker. Not wanting to pay it back, I pay to the
assassination bot and arrange him to be murdered.
Another story: suppose that I negligently caused fire that destroys
house of, say, Toto. Toto knows that if he sues me, I can arrange him
murdered for the amount less than the amount of damages. As a result,
he refrains from suing me, or (if he is a mean person) pays additional
money to have me murdered. A suit would probably be a much better outcome.
Another story: suppose that OKSAS hired me to work for her, but then
our relationships go south and she fires me. Again, her fate is very
unclear, although I would probably spare her life if it were she.
The bottom line is, it becomes very hard to do ANYTHING that disappoints
at least somebody. That can lead to a lot of inefficiencies.
- Igor.
Return to February 1997
Return to “OKSAS <oksas@asimov.montclair.edu>”