From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: faf42a7cf6bdf7bcbefbe5caf5db6ee23171cba0b00fd2331dabf790de2885a2
Message ID: <m0uCiBY-00094cC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-26 13:32:06 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 21:32:06 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 1996 21:32:06 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: [NOISE] What is "laser material"?
Message-ID: <m0uCiBY-00094cC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 09:05 PM 4/25/96 -0700, Bill Frantz wrote:
>> The Washington Post, April 25, 1996, p. A12.
>>
>>
>> Israelis Eye U.S. Laser As Anti-Rocket Defense
>>
>> 'Nautilus' Beam Burns Surface of Weapon
>>
>> By John Mintz
>>
>>...
>> Moreover, a laser shot costs $3,000, compared to several
>> million dollars for a missile. Army officials envision the
>> Nautilus would be beamed from a truck capable of firing 50
>> shots before requiring more laser material.
>
>Does anyone have any idea what "more laser material" means?
Hydrogen and fluorine, possibly. Some of the more energetic lasers use this
combination.
Jim "He only talks about one thing" Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to April 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-04-26 (Fri, 26 Apr 1996 21:32:06 +0800) - Re: [NOISE] What is “laser material”? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>