From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Blake Coverett <blake@bcdev.com>
Message Hash: 21df7aa1829858ec9df28b11d83e0fcd2da649cf1638bf9aecad1562dd7fe26a
Message ID: <m0u7Unh-0008yfC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-13 16:40:04 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 00:40:04 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 00:40:04 +0800
To: Blake Coverett <blake@bcdev.com>
Subject: RE: questions about bits and bytes
Message-ID: <m0u7Unh-0008yfC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:36 AM 4/11/96 -0400, Blake Coverett wrote:
>> At 06:29 PM 4/10/96 -0700, Simon Spero wrote:
>> >No, bytes are no always 8 bits - some machines use(d) 9-bit bytes.
>>
>> I notice you gave no examples. Why is that?
>>
>> Jim Bell
>> jimbell@pacifier.com
>
>In a past life I worked on a Honeywell DPS8 box that had
>36 bit words and 9 bit bytes.
I'm seeing a few notes of this sort which make such claims, but there is not
enough information included to establish that anybody _originally_ called
those 9-bit data items "bytes" or not. It appears to me that after the
fact, 20+ years later, there is a tendency to call ANYTHING other than a
single bit a byte, at least during that time frame. What I'm looking for,
however, is an indication that this was actually the term used, THEN, for
that data structure.
Return to April 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-04-13 (Sun, 14 Apr 1996 00:40:04 +0800) - RE: questions about bits and bytes - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>