1996-04-13 - RE: questions about bits and bytes

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Blake Coverett <blake@bcdev.com>
Message Hash: 21df7aa1829858ec9df28b11d83e0fcd2da649cf1638bf9aecad1562dd7fe26a
Message ID: <m0u7Unh-0008yfC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-13 16:40:04 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 00:40:04 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 00:40:04 +0800
To: Blake Coverett <blake@bcdev.com>
Subject: RE: questions about bits and bytes
Message-ID: <m0u7Unh-0008yfC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:36 AM 4/11/96 -0400, Blake Coverett wrote:
>> At 06:29 PM 4/10/96 -0700, Simon Spero wrote:
>> >No, bytes are no always 8 bits - some machines use(d) 9-bit bytes. 
>> 
>> I notice you gave no examples.  Why is that?
>> 
>> Jim Bell
>> jimbell@pacifier.com
>
>In a past life I worked on a Honeywell DPS8 box that had 
>36 bit words and 9 bit bytes.

I'm seeing a few notes of this sort which make such claims, but there is not 
enough information included to establish that anybody _originally_ called 
those 9-bit data items "bytes" or not.  It appears to me that after the 
fact, 20+ years later, there is a tendency to call ANYTHING other than a 
single bit a byte, at least during that time frame.  What I'm looking for, 
however, is an indication that this was actually the term used, THEN, for 
that data structure.






Thread