From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: acg@mandrake.cen.ufl.edu (Alexandra Griffin)
Message Hash: aa376ba18bab60679795bb2f7e820be0ce167d7786c40d3fc4357f3473bef059
Message ID: <m0toNKI-0008zmC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-19 05:21:49 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 13:21:49 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 13:21:49 +0800
To: acg@mandrake.cen.ufl.edu (Alexandra Griffin)
Subject: Re:
Message-ID: <m0toNKI-0008zmC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 08:13 PM 2/18/96 -0500, Dave Emery wrote:
>
>>
>> Bob writes:
>>
>> > Does anyone know if the new in-line optical amplifiers (not switches!) have
>> > any effect on quantum crypto messages?
>
> Optical
>> repeaters have to pass your signal through an intermediate electronic
>> stage anyway, since we have no purely optical valve/transistor
>> equivalents (bosons don't interact with each other at all).
>
> This is not true. There is now a whole technology of optical
>amplifiers for fiber communications systems that used Ettrium doped
>fibers pumped
The proper name is "Erbium." But the rest of Dave Emery's commentary is
accurate.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Klaatu Burada Nikto
Something is going to happen. Something.....Wonderful!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBMSfqOPqHVDBboB2dAQH9vgP/X8sK3BdAwqf3clXxP31DZJqH6xLjMX3l
UxZSDsLOJ7MRrkJ3h2WV+cBXtu6ZA/zOOjmjh+o+U+b4rEPQrVWfj10LyV5uYC7l
Du9Sq6S3/qD9MVJLG5dTB3rnaLRh0alBWInyJBIJZz2Y7cjHJ+LCu7u++u39uLzv
V5WV2DSdWW8=
=QJ7q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to February 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-02-19 (Mon, 19 Feb 1996 13:21:49 +0800) - Re: - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>