From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: “Declan B. McCullagh” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1c3c2016afc5ccfd4227389c9a3045ca2a9aa6f2bd1ff6e793f82e63b8e582bb
Message ID: <199606290531.WAA15509@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-29 08:04:16 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 16:04:16 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 16:04:16 +0800
To: "Declan B. McCullagh" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: News: NEC has encrypted networks ...
Message-ID: <199606290531.WAA15509@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 10:52 PM 6/28/96 -0400, Declan B. McCullagh wrote:
>Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 28-Jun-96 News: NEC has encrypted
>net.. by Ernest Hua@XENON.chromat
>> Japanese companies catching up and passing American companies
>> should scare those Congressional critters into action:
>
>Realistically, there's not a chance in hell Pro-CODE will pass this
>session.
>-Declan
Which reminds me...
About that NTT chip: While I haven't been looking particularly carefully
for it, I haven't noticed an announcement in any of the electronics
magazines I normally read. Has anyone seen a reference to it?
I think we ought to learn more about it: Does it implement an open
standard, so that other manufacturers can build compatible phones?
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to June 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 16:04:16 +0800) - Re: News: NEC has encrypted networks … - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>