From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: “Alan Pugh” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1da3ebfd4cf6d929c8c686df1a5d3f4f743752de22385007c67ff201ac067406
Message ID: <199611220131.RAA28545@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-11-22 01:31:45 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 17:31:45 -0800 (PST)
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 17:31:45 -0800 (PST)
To: "Alan Pugh" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Patent Fight Could Add to Cost of Inter
Message-ID: <199611220131.RAA28545@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 05:06 AM 11/21/96 CST, Alan Pugh wrote:
>
>By KATHLEEN SAMPEY
>Associated Press Writer
>
>NEW YORK (AP) _ A little-known patent could raise the cost of
>doing business over the Internet for companies selling software,
>video or other digital products delivered online.
>
>E-Data Corp. of Secaucus, N.J., is suing 17 companies, including
>McGraw-Hill and CompuServe, to collect licensing fees on the
>patent, which protects downloading of encrypted digital
>information. A court hearing is scheduled Dec. 6 in New York on the
>company's claims.
Notice, as usual, the Orwellian use of the word "protects" in the paragraph
above. While apparently written by a journalist, it echoes the usage of
lawyers. Nothing is really being "protected," it is being monopolized.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to November 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-11-22 (Thu, 21 Nov 1996 17:31:45 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Patent Fight Could Add to Cost of Inter - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>