From: Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
To: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
Message Hash: d427f31ace0227f4fe239f9bf8b07c2b44fdeef4aeba9ad7b2e7ad3fea00aadf
Message ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960124100950.4551A-100000@nic.wat.hookup.net>
Reply To: <199601240336.WAA11471@jekyll.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-24 15:55:19 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 23:55:19 +0800
From: Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 1996 23:55:19 +0800
To: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Subject: Re: SS Obergruppenfuhrer Zimmermann (NOT!)
In-Reply-To: <199601240336.WAA11471@jekyll.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.3.91.960124100950.4551A-100000@nic.wat.hookup.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
If I recall correctly, the Zimmermann Telegram did NOT bring the US into
the war. It was however one of the many things that lead to a US decision
to enter the war. In itself it did not cause the US entry.
Just my $0.02
Tim Philp
===================================
For PGP Public Key, Send E-mail to:
pgp-public-keys@swissnet.ai.mit.edu
In Subject line type:
GET PHILP
===================================
On Tue, 23 Jan 1996, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
>
> jim bell writes:
> > Maybe this is common knowledge, but the name "Zimmermann" and crypto had
> > another relationship, in World War I. If anybody knows more about this
> > incident than my vague recollection of the famous "Zimmermann cipher" would
> > you care to tell the story?
>
> It was the Zimmermann Telegram, actually, and it was a dispatch from
> the Germans to the Mexicans trying to promise them most of the
> southwest in exchange for being allies against the U.S. (which wasn't
> yet in the war). The Brits intercepted and decoded it and released it,
> which forced the U.S. into World War I.
>
> Perry
>
Return to January 1996
Return to “Tim Philp <bplib@wat.hookup.net>”