1996-03-13 - Re: How’s that again?

Header Data

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: 80c96ab8ea8b52ad300f33d92e8969b8b0ebb94f605fd93b13d10a46348f83af
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960312143109.13566C-100000@crl.crl.com>
Reply To: <m0twag5-0008xXC@pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-13 04:21:50 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:21:50 +0800

Raw message

From: Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:21:50 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: How's that again?
In-Reply-To: <m0twag5-0008xXC@pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960312143109.13566C-100000@crl.crl.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                          SANDY SANDFORT
 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

C'punks,

On Tue, 12 Mar 1996, jim bell wrote:

> You will notice, I assume, that I have been and can be tactful to most 
> people; where exceptions exist, they are typically among anonymous posters 
> (such as this "Black Unicorn") ...
> Oh, yes, and I can't forget Padgett Peterson, who has raised spinelessness 
> to a new art form.

Hey, Jim, don't forget me.  You are the only person I have ever
specifically UNinvited to one of my parties in over a decade of
hosting same.  I guess that makes you special.


 S a n d y  (just another statist apologist)  S a n d f o r t

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~








Thread