1997-01-27 - Re: libsln.htm – Is Libel a Crime?

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: ede07dce2d5cbae13b15a5e2d9a688fbbc0602c729ca6c5b264691c70728a864
Message ID: <199701272252.OAA08288@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-27 22:52:34 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 14:52:34 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 1997 14:52:34 -0800 (PST)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: libsln.htm -- Is Libel a Crime?
Message-ID: <199701272252.OAA08288@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 01:14 AM 1/27/97 -0600, ichudov@algebra.com wrote:

>I am not sure if you posted this information in response to my request
>to cite a statute that would prove that libel is a crime.
>
>Me> Jim Choate wrote:
>Me> > 
>Me> > 
>Me> > 
>Me> > Are you aware that attributing statements in print to a party when that
>Me> > party did not write them is a crime?
>Me> 
>Me> cite the statute
>
>
>These postings do not prove that libel is a crime. It is because libel
>is not a crime. Libel is a tort, and unlike with crime, the government
>cannot initiate a legal action against someone for libel. Only injured
>(libeled) individuals and not the government can sue in a libel case.

On the contrary, in some jurisdictions libel is indeed a crime. However, 
that doesn't mean that prosecutions happen anymore, but the laws are (in 
some places) still  on the books.




Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com






Thread