From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Mike McNally <jamesd@echeque.com
Message Hash: dc730973ff96526a8ef74e26c8700fe909f1083eb27bde40ce3eb1319dc35992
Message ID: <m0u6iqv-0008ymC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-10 01:44:27 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 09:44:27 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 1996 09:44:27 +0800
To: Mike McNally <jamesd@echeque.com
Subject: Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don't Work
Message-ID: <m0u6iqv-0008ymC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 07:57 AM 4/9/96 -0500, Mike McNally wrote:
>jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
>There are supposedly some new techniques that look at the infrared
>signature of your face (like, I guess, distribution & position of
>hot & cold spots), and that's less likely to be fooled by facial
>hair and other superficial disguises. It's probably a fairly simple
>technology, and could be applied to the credit card ID problem.
I think this is based on looking at your face with near-infrared, not the medium and far (thermal) infrared. Near infrared is supposed to penetrate flesh far better, so your blood vessels are visible and form a pattern which can be recognized.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to April 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-04-10 (Wed, 10 Apr 1996 09:44:27 +0800) - Re: (Fwd) British Study Claims That Photo Credit Cards Don’t Work - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>