1996-06-07 - Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS

Header Data

From: “Declan B. McCullagh” <declan+@CMU.EDU>
To: jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: 6dc9f900a0a9914c97856e76b2697f82e2698d36e56fa19b88c37d98ae1b7f06
Message ID: <8li234S00YUzE1usAp@andrew.cmu.edu>
Reply To: <199606070633.XAA01053@mail.pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-07 20:42:12 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 04:42:12 +0800

Raw message

From: "Declan B. McCullagh" <declan+@CMU.EDU>
Date: Sat, 8 Jun 1996 04:42:12 +0800
To: jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS
In-Reply-To: <199606070633.XAA01053@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <8li234S00YUzE1usAp@andrew.cmu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Excerpts from internet.cypherpunks: 6-Jun-96 Re: FOR WHOM THE BELL TOLLS
by jim bell@pacifier.com 
> Not quite yet, anyway.  I'm very disappointed to have waited over a year for 
> some slick lawyer to show me how I'd be violating some law or another
to do so
> .

A few observations:

1. Not many readers of cypherpunks are lawyers
2. Of the laywers who do read cypherpunks, many may not choose to spend
their time researching what laws AP may violate. Or they're not "slick"
lawyers; take your pick.
3. Congress would have no problems passing a law outlawing AP, if one
does not exist already.

-Declan






Thread