From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 1996 12:20:16 +0800
To: Sandy Sandfort <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: How's that again?
Message-ID: <m0tweHS-0008zIC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 02:38 PM 3/12/96 -0800, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>                          SANDY SANDFORT
> . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
>
>C'punks,
>
>On Tue, 12 Mar 1996, jim bell wrote:
>
>> You will notice, I assume, that I have been and can be tactful to most 
>> people; where exceptions exist, they are typically among anonymous posters 
>> (such as this "Black Unicorn") ...
>> Oh, yes, and I can't forget Padgett Peterson, who has raised spinelessness 
>> to a new art form.
>
>Hey, Jim, don't forget me.  You are the only person I have ever
>specifically UNinvited to one of my parties in over a decade of
>hosting same.  I guess that makes you special.
>
>
> S a n d y  (just another statist apologist)  S a n d f o r t

You're confused.  You're describe YOUR reaction to ME, not MY reaction to 
YOU.  And I am unaware of being invited to a "party," and now that I've 
discovered what a sleazy person Alan Olsen and his merry band are, it is 
really doubtful that I would have enjoyed what was advertised as a 
cypherpunks meeting, but which you now claim was a "party."  Your level of 
"honesty" is showing.