From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: a5851e57614c9e2496195f47cd630c6879f6785512d11e78f85a39ab6cc4c1b0
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960621170212.3961B-100000@polaris>
Reply To: <199606211849.LAA04215@mail.pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-22 02:25:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:25:51 +0800
From: Black Unicorn <unicorn@schloss.li>
Date: Sat, 22 Jun 1996 10:25:51 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Sen. Specter and Kerry move to delay crypto legislation
In-Reply-To: <199606211849.LAA04215@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.93.960621170212.3961B-100000@polaris>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 21 Jun 1996, jim bell wrote:
> [rest of letter to Leahy deleted]
> Since "everybody" is supposed to agree that the Leahy encryption bill is
> dead, dead, dead, I don't see this as being any kind of problem. It was
> disliked by Clinton and the Denning-types, and with the exception of a short
> flurry of mistaken optimism around here, it was roundly excoriated here as
> well.
To which which Leahy Bill are you referring?
> Jim Bell
> jimbell@pacifier.com
---
My preferred and soon to be permanent e-mail address:unicorn@schloss.li
"In fact, had Bancroft not existed, potestas scientiae in usu est
Franklin might have had to invent him." in nihilum nil posse reverti
00B9289C28DC0E55 E16D5378B81E1C96 - Finger for Current Key Information
Opp. Counsel: For all your expert testimony needs: jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to June 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”