From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: “Vladimir Z. Nuri” <vznuri@netcom.com>
Message Hash: 50244a9440dadd5091e1c2b92b43f7c444df8eb5637616908995dc8b4760b206
Message ID: <199608181532.IAA18019@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-18 18:00:11 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 02:00:11 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 02:00:11 +0800
To: "Vladimir Z. Nuri" <vznuri@netcom.com>
Subject: Re: BlackNet as a Distributed, Untraceable, Robust Data Haven
Message-ID: <199608181532.IAA18019@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 10:40 PM 8/17/96 -0700, Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote:
>
>>I have to speak up here and say that there is an actual working exemplar of
>>a distributed, untraceable data haven. While it lacks a robust _payment_
>>mechanism, that is also untraceable, so does the "Visit Port Watson"
>>example (which has never actually existed).
>
>agree with Jim Bell that blacknet by any stretch of the imagination
>is not a "data haven".
I've not yet commented on this thread! Sounds like you're confusing me with somebody else.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to August 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”