1996-08-18 - Re: BlackNet as a Distributed, Untraceable, Robust Data Haven

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 18db3d50d4271c13424fcb6aec935ef2e79b006d2a9cd140fcb65e40da8dc7e5
Message ID: <ey9usD21w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <199608181532.IAA18019@mail.pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-18 21:12:17 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 05:12:17 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Mon, 19 Aug 1996 05:12:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: BlackNet as a Distributed, Untraceable, Robust Data Haven
In-Reply-To: <199608181532.IAA18019@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <ey9usD21w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com> writes:

> At 10:40 PM 8/17/96 -0700, Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote:
> >
> >>I have to speak up here and say that there is an actual working exemplar of
> >>a distributed, untraceable data haven. While it lacks a robust _payment_
> >>mechanism, that is also untraceable, so does the "Visit Port Watson"
> >>example (which has never actually existed).
> >
> >agree with Jim Bell that blacknet by any stretch of the imagination
> >is not a "data haven".
>
> I've not yet commented on this thread!  Sounds like you're confusing me with

It's hard to keep track of Lance's tentacles.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps





Thread