1996-02-09 - Re: In Re: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

Header Data

From: “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 159c918e4181533643f4cf7e2bb970f9017b10c1c91e0d36689baa639cd8f710
Message ID: <199602090206.VAA09894@jekyll.piermont.com>
Reply To: <199602081935.OAA08993@jekyll.piermont.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-09 02:54:42 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 10:54:42 +0800

Raw message

From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 10:54:42 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: In Re: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199602081935.OAA08993@jekyll.piermont.com>
Message-ID: <199602090206.VAA09894@jekyll.piermont.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



So, Ed Carp couldn't leave well enough alone. I killfiled him and
apparently he had the bad taste to send me some mail about it, and
when my robot replied to him informing him that I had no interest in
whatever he might have had to say, he seems to have a desperate need
to get in the last word by forwarding the message from my robot to the
mailing list.

Mr. Carp, you've got extremely bad taste. Luckily, I don't have to
ever see anything you have to say ever again.

Perry


"Perry's Mail Filter" writes:
> 
> I am sorry, but your message with the Subject:
> 
> 	Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) 
> 
> was rejected by Perry Metzger's mail filter and will not be read by
> him. This is likely because Perry decided to place you on his reject
> list. Perry tends to clean out his filter lists every six months, so
> you may be able to send him electronic mail again sometime in the
> future.
> 
> If you absolutely need to contact Perry, please use means other than
> electronic mail, or ask a third party to contact him on your behalf.
> 
> You will not receive further copies of this notice.
> 
> Perry's Mail Filter
> 
> 





Thread