1996-02-08 - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: perry@piermont.com
Message Hash: dcc7f5323bc90b4b623321ae829a4b1cfa4aa5accbfeec3b34493f4d4e45e5cb
Message ID: <m0tkaxx-0008ywC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-08 19:12:23 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 03:12:23 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 1996 03:12:23 +0800
To: perry@piermont.com
Subject: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd)
Message-ID: <m0tkaxx-0008ywC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 08:07 PM 2/7/96 -0500, Perry E. Metzger wrote:

>Look folks, I'm really sick about the debate about Jim's ideas about
>"assassination politics". (My opinion about the idea isn't
>transmittable under the Exon law so I couldn't say anything anyway).
>
>This has gone off into political theory. Could we take it to private
>mail or some such?

Apparently, other people are just as unhappy with your attempts to act as 
"moderator" of this list.  Wake up!  Freedom is on the line.

Klaatu B
urada Nikto.

Jim Bell

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMRo+rfqHVDBboB2dAQG5kAP/Zg/Blm/J2ym4G/TSPxgyMy94+Jw3F4gx
V4TGLtbtSDKYmKneGx6GcKLj4Ai6G5I/Ls58K8Agz1QCrZLOqoB2P41JH3/DI6ka
aJRlj8du6e+T0CoAVvun5ANwZSY6nqtJmjLdc+Wwxfs3T1l9KZDDkO+1FoWu8SDT
0P8D71Kzz+w=
=amJV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Thread

• Return to February 1996

• Return to “David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>”
• Return to “dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)”
• Return to “Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>”
• Return to ““Ed Carp, KHIJOL SysAdmin” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>”
• Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
• Return to ““Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>”

• Return to ““Perry’s Mail Filter” <perry@piermont.com>”

• 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 03:12:23 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
  • 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 03:09:52 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
    • 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 03:45:14 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Ed Carp, KHIJOL SysAdmin” <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
      • 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 04:14:25 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
        • 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 04:04:32 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
          • 1996-02-08 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 04:39:57 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - David Lesher <wb8foz@nrk.com>
          • 1996-02-09 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 12:06:23 +0800) - Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)
          • 1996-02-10 (Sat, 10 Feb 1996 18:10:03 +0800) - In Re: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Perry’s Mail Filter” <perry@piermont.com>
            • 1996-02-09 (Fri, 9 Feb 1996 10:54:42 +0800) - Re: In Re: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - “Perry E. Metzger” <perry@piermont.com>
              • 1996-02-11 (Sun, 11 Feb 1996 19:38:51 +0800) - Re: In Re: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - Ed Carp <erc@dal1820.computek.net>
                • 1996-02-10 (Sat, 10 Feb 1996 23:29:30 +0800) - Re: In Re: Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I (fwd) - dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr. Dimitri Vulis)