From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Robbie Gates <gates_r@maths.su.oz.au>
Message Hash: 8b51d43d02ab2d30b92792426c796d39c9075b9c875bf24f084bf0c470ccb72a
Message ID: <m0tY2h0-00097wC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-01-05 05:28:46 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 13:28:46 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 1996 13:28:46 +0800
To: Robbie Gates <gates_r@maths.su.oz.au>
Subject: Representations of Pi, etc.
Message-ID: <m0tY2h0-00097wC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 09:39 AM 1/5/96 +1100, you wrote:
>> The decimal representation of any irrational number (e.g. pi, e)
>> contains the decimal representation of every natural number
>> somewhere. (Proof by diagonalization.)
>What you say here isn't quite true.
Right.
But BTW, isn't it interesting, that news item from a few weeks ago, on an
algorithm for determining individual bits in Pi, regardless of whether
you've calculated all the previous ones. Only problem is, it only works in
hexadecimal (and, obviously, binary, etc, not decimal.
Return to January 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-01-05 (Fri, 5 Jan 1996 13:28:46 +0800) - Representations of Pi, etc. - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>