1996-05-16 - Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber

Header Data

From: brian dodds <jyacc!aspen!bdodds@uunet.uu.net>
To: aspen!uunet!toad.com!cypherpunks@uunet.uu.net
Message Hash: 753fe76056eb15097b3c34d93b482b306f3c3e5ea18e710d90ed39acea73df6d
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960515110240.13298Z-100000@aspen>
Reply To: <199605150618.XAA28824@pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-16 00:12:49 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 08:12:49 +0800

Raw message

From: brian dodds <jyacc!aspen!bdodds@uunet.uu.net>
Date: Thu, 16 May 1996 08:12:49 +0800
To: aspen!uunet!toad.com!cypherpunks@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: Past one terabit/second on fiber
In-Reply-To: <199605150618.XAA28824@pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.960515110240.13298Z-100000@aspen>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Tue, 14 May 1996, jim bell wrote:

> But with 
> fiber transmission probably less than 1/100th the cost of older coaxial 
> transmission systems, per connection, it is unclear why they're even 
> continuing to meter LD phone calls.  

especially when 1Tb fiber is in practice - our phone calls will take only 
nanoseconds! :)

anything included in that as to why they used a dfb laser for channel 16? 
or is it something obvious i'm missing? 

i notice they're still using the encyclopedia/second benchmark..

				bri..

--bdodds@jyacc.com
brian dodds, systems administration, jyacc, inc. wellesley, ma 
--617.431.7431x125
opinions expressed within are not necessarily my own or anyone elses..






Thread