cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-02-15 - Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997

Header Data

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: ichudov@algebra.com
Message Hash: 1fa4d4761b2775b3c147189562edb00854e798081854d93f93abfb78a723703b
Message ID: <199702150744.BAA03785@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <199702150634.AAA13324@manifold.algebra.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-02-15 07:25:43 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 23:25:43 -0800 (PST)

Raw message

From: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 1997 23:25:43 -0800 (PST)
To: ichudov@algebra.com
Subject: Re: Excerpt on SPAM from Edupage, 11 February 1997
In-Reply-To: <199702150634.AAA13324@manifold.algebra.com>
Message-ID: <199702150744.BAA03785@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


Igor said:
> I can suggest a scheme where a fee would be attached to the message,
> and the recipient would be able to get the money only after having
> read and understood the message.
> 
> For example, you might receive the following message (it could be encrypted
> by your public key to preserve the cash from the MITM):

> do get them to read) will have a very high response rate. That may 
> justify adding postage to their letters.
> 
> The advantages are obvious. The disadvantage is a possibility of someone
> stealing the money on the way, if the letters are not encrypted.

	That would be great. Sit home all day and hit web pages for a living.

Thread