1995-12-27 - Re: FH radios
Header Data
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: die@die.com
Message Hash: 269818f477805662961b7319258d55348f551f695846b34e350073bfd6dc2c35
Message ID: <m0tUNYc-0008xnC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1995-12-27 06:05:55 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1995 14:05:55 +0800
Raw message
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Dec 1995 14:05:55 +0800
To: die@die.com
Subject: Re: FH radios
Message-ID: <m0tUNYc-0008xnC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 05:06 PM 12/25/95 -0500, you wrote:
> There is certainly little additional cost to building a
>trully secure digital cordless phone given the dense ASIC technology
>that is standard in this kind of product - but someone has to
>persuade the manufacturers that there is a real need and find a way
>to allow them to export the product.
>
> Dave Emery N1PRE
Is there actually a restriction on the export of really-fast
frequency-hopping radios, even those (like cordless phones) which have no
clear military value?
Thread
Return to December 1995
- Return to “Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>”
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
- 1995-12-27 (Wed, 27 Dec 1995 14:05:55 +0800) - Re: FH radios - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
- 1995-12-26 (Tue, 26 Dec 1995 12:14:29 +0800) - Re: FH radios - Adam Shostack <adam@lighthouse.homeport.org>