From: bryce@digicash.com
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: c7f0dd14fb8a6d3e2e4c3a32e2d7a0f49584562e0cae7f45f1f2f62145d097fb
Message ID: <199605160809.KAA17994@digicash.com>
Reply To: <199605160602.XAA28844@pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-05-17 20:27:20 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 04:27:20 +0800
From: bryce@digicash.com
Date: Sat, 18 May 1996 04:27:20 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Why does the state still stand:
In-Reply-To: <199605160602.XAA28844@pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <199605160809.KAA17994@digicash.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
(conversation history:)
<JamesD@echeque.com> said current ecash was hard to use.
<bryce@digicash.com> said 'no way'.
The entity calling itself jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
is alleged to have written:
>
> But what I'm looking for is full payee/payor anonymity. (three guesses as
> to why...) Can you do this? If not, why not?
Let me get this straight. You are asking for full payee/payor
anonymity so that you can institute a program of anonymous
assassination contracts, right?
Fuck off.
Bryce
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
Comment: http://www.c2.net/~bryce -- 'BAP' Easy-PGP v1.1b2
iQB1AwUBMZri0EjbHy8sKZitAQFOSwL9EjmbEwDTnId7QcYdUcP43Gx60dtvPwNf
FQktBdqZXRL72+NAbfqz73djeCioFdY/GOXMxdEkKDy3E8RA9mdZmJRLytboIs03
zdhcAGmxBxEHXC0t9Cz3ZzpClS8ddpWn
=UX8r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to May 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”