From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Message Hash: add5b11c2d69f50d804604329ad0fdfbffbcb1e554aa3a19a9d44cdc5d5dd650
Message ID: <199607201846.LAA22368@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-20 20:57:04 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 04:57:04 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 1996 04:57:04 +0800
To: snow <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Subject: Re: ABC News on internet telephony
Message-ID: <199607201846.LAA22368@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 02:12 AM 7/19/96 -0500, snow wrote:
> It is my understanding that billing is one of the biggest headaches
>and expenses for a phone company. Going to a flat rate would solve a
>decent amount of that wouldn't it?
I've heard it claimed that billing and customer service is half of their
costs, at least. If that's the case, then "flat rate" billing can't be far
behind. Prodded by "free" Internet phone, they can't avoid it for much
longer.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to July 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-07-20 (Sun, 21 Jul 1996 04:57:04 +0800) - Re: ABC News on internet telephony - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>