cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1996-10-09 - Re: “Forward Privacy” for ISPs and Customers

Header Data

From: “Mark M.” <markm@voicenet.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: ce5f40954ea142fb3f39e5df3f9cd4d0ed8cddbc41a8c64b403bb3b44249c5d7
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961009171647.683B-100000@gak.voicenet.com>
Reply To: <v03007802ae819385a300@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-09 21:25:40 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 14:25:40 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: "Mark M." <markm@voicenet.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 1996 14:25:40 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: "Forward Privacy" for ISPs and Customers
In-Reply-To: <v03007802ae819385a300@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.961009171647.683B-100000@gak.voicenet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 9 Oct 1996, Timothy C. May wrote:

> Back to the legal issue. Perhaps the Digital Telephony Act will be
> interpreted to require ISPs to make their systems "tappable," possibly by
> adding message logging. possibly just by offering access to the T1s and T3s
> only ("OK, Feds, here's where the T3 enters the building...be careful you
> don't cut the core, OK?").

I think there is a section of DT that explicitly excludes ISP's.
Of course, this can, and probably will be, changed.

Mark
--
finger -l for key
PGP encrypted mail prefered.

Good signature from user "Mark Miller 2048-bit key <markm@voicenet.com>".

Thread