1996-03-08 - Re: Quotations

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: “A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 56be3b168fe7801e335c49d435709c92bd39dd8b5f23619f830cb7a7946198b6
Message ID: <m0tv5t9-00093aC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-03-08 19:43:27 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 03:43:27 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 1996 03:43:27 +0800
To: "A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Quotations
Message-ID: <m0tv5t9-00093aC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

At 09:17 AM 3/8/96 -0500, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security wrote:
>Mr. Bell posted:
>>Note to the rest of you:  Observe how Mr. Peterson carefully avoids quoting 
>>any material that was contained in my notes to him.  This makes his failure 
>>to respond to my points less clear.  This is entirely intentional on his part.
>
>The reason I avoided references is that the E-Mail in question was sent off 
>line to him personally.

1.  Peterson admits he "avoided" references.

2.  The "reason" he gave (that the material was sent to me personally) does 
not justify or even explain his failing to quote my material and respond to 
it.  He could have just as easily sent me email that contained responses to 
all of my comments, had he chosen to do so.


> Fortunately I do not expect others to respect that 
>so avoid saying anything that cannot be made public.

I do not "respect" sleazy people, and especially sleazy people who are 
trying to evade the issues and their failure to be able to address the 
matters under discussion by hiding it in email.  I refuse to assist others 
in hiding their dishonesty by such a tactic.  Since the matter started out 
as a public discussion, I chose to keep it public and still choose this.

> However in such cases 
>I do not feel any need to requote everything I am responding to.

Except that your failure to quote that material was clearly intended to 
disguise the fact that you had no satisfactory response (even by your own 
standards!) to my commentary.  This is typical of you.

Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBMUBtIPqHVDBboB2dAQFZoQP6AjnijC6gNXWewtrRs3PMYLQn/nUQSQ31
vEQcQMVd+M0siyiv9DdARNGM/Vt6vfxuEIRrfZFw3uUTjLJvjHi7MxsD8BEGUbCZ
z1+6OA8y3ei7yJ7h3zL7lFi+0m76lA0Njp3HSscRXPkNPAGJR7WnMlJcl6ELsDv5
WZygZS8ivlo=
=JTFh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----






Thread