From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: a6e5c28140313f4e3023730446e736f6d763d7ec40a72e9c8e817cff14c47138
Message ID: <199606290549.WAA16170@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-06-29 09:42:19 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 17:42:19 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Jun 1996 17:42:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: rsync and md4
Message-ID: <199606290549.WAA16170@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 01:50 PM 6/29/96 +1000, Andrew Tridgell wrote:
>Why md4? I chose md4 because it seemed to be the fastest of the
>reputedly strong, publicly available checksum algorithms.
Whatever you do, PLEASE stop using the term "checksum" when what you really
mean is CRC, hash or something else. A "checksum" is a bad error checker,
only somewhat better than none at all. If you use the term "checksum" some
neophyte might actually misinterpret what you're doing and implement a real,
honest-to-goodness checksum in his next program.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to June 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-06-29 (Sat, 29 Jun 1996 17:42:19 +0800) - Re: rsync and md4 - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>