1996-04-27 - Re: trusting the processor chip

Header Data

From: Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9c88cf6d71d8cabda301bbb56e1ed59956e8a423271f1e2b04839d45198fcdb5
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960427002329.371K-100000@crash.suba.com>
Reply To: <m0uCa4r-00094aC@pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-27 08:47:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:47:17 +0800

Raw message

From: Snow <snow@crash.suba.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 1996 16:47:17 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: trusting the processor chip
In-Reply-To: <m0uCa4r-00094aC@pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.960427002329.371K-100000@crash.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Thu, 25 Apr 1996, jim bell wrote:
> 
> This analysis seems to assume that the entire production run of a standard 
> product is subverted.  More likely,I think, an organization like the NSA 
> might build a pin-compatible version of an existing, commonly-used product 
> like a keyboard encoder chip that is designed to transmit (by RFI signals) 
> the contents of what is typed at the keyboard.  It's simple, it's hard to 
> detect, and it gets what they want.

	I thought that most (all?) chips already radiated on the 
electromagnetic spectrum? Isn't that what tempest is about?





Thread