1996-08-15 - Re: Stopped Clock. Was: Schlafly on Crypto

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: “Marc J. Wohler” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2f2f7fa44c4a1996b86ae49da74794de8fc0e366ef4dd5274abeec1c1522e40b
Message ID: <199608150016.RAA00804@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-15 03:04:10 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 11:04:10 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 1996 11:04:10 +0800
To: "Marc J. Wohler" <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Stopped Clock. Was: Schlafly on Crypto
Message-ID: <199608150016.RAA00804@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 11:46 AM 8/14/96 -0400, Marc J. Wohler wrote:
>At 07:59 AM 8/14/96 -0400, you wrote:
>>Subject: Clinton Is Trying to be Big Brother -- Phyllis Schlafly Column 8/8/96
>
>It makes me ill to agree with Schlafly on any issue, but 'Even a stopped
>clock.......
>Unrepentant Liberial

It does seem really odd, doesn't it?  But look at it this way:  The only 
reason the knuckle-dragging conservatives are able to take the moral 
high-ground on this and other net-freedom issues is because the OTHER 
"unrependant liberals" have inexplicably abandoned the correct side of the 
argument.  The fact that the conservatives are right may seem odd, but the 
behavior of the liberals is truly astonishing.


Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com





Thread