From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 11599d6ccd7e9a9a1b4f895fd1cc2ea00581817a93be28c429202ac51346dbeb
Message ID: <m0uCIti-00094cC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-25 04:54:39 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues
Message-ID: <m0uCIti-00094cC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 07:07 AM 4/24/96 -0700, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
>At 11:45 PM 4/23/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
>> And so the back-and-forth continues...taking up even more list space
>> arguing, waffling, finessing, rebutting, disputing, and on an on.
>>
>> Exactly as several of us have predicted.
>
>True, but one should note that it is Jim Bell that is weaseling,
>and that Unicorn is not weaseling.
Who says? Unicorn started by making an unbelievable challenge (especially
given the fact that he, unlike I, is anonymous) and THEN he claimed that he
didn't believe we'd ever agree to terms, etc.
This sounds like weaseling to me. Let Unicorn FIRST identify himself. Then
we'll see who's "weaseling."
Return to April 1996
Return to “Sandy Sandfort <sandfort@crl.com>”