1996-04-25 - Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 11599d6ccd7e9a9a1b4f895fd1cc2ea00581817a93be28c429202ac51346dbeb
Message ID: <m0uCIti-00094cC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-25 04:54:39 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:54:39 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 1996 21:54:39 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Meta: The Arguing about the Terms of the Wager Continues
Message-ID: <m0uCIti-00094cC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 07:07 AM 4/24/96 -0700, jamesd@echeque.com wrote:
>At 11:45 PM 4/23/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote:
>> And so the back-and-forth continues...taking up even more list space
>> arguing, waffling, finessing, rebutting, disputing, and on an on.
>>
>> Exactly as several of us have predicted.
>
>True, but one should note that it is Jim Bell that is weaseling,
>and that Unicorn is not weaseling.

Who says?  Unicorn started by making an unbelievable challenge (especially 
given the fact that he, unlike I, is anonymous) and THEN he claimed that he 
didn't believe we'd ever agree to terms, etc.

This sounds like weaseling to me.  Let Unicorn FIRST identify himself.  Then 
we'll see who's "weaseling."






Thread