1996-04-06 - Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: unicorn@schloss.li (Black Unicorn)
Message Hash: 2b38be06c363f26760beeed37f2590084030769f157b2d3faaebb14fe207058d
Message ID: <m0u5QPq-0008xyC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-06 10:41:37 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 18:41:37 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 1996 18:41:37 +0800
To: unicorn@schloss.li (Black Unicorn)
Subject: Re: So, what crypto legislation (if any) is necessary?
Message-ID: <m0u5QPq-0008xyC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 12:37 PM 4/5/96 -0800, sameer@c2.org wrote:
>> Where I differ with Mr. Bell is that he seems to think the ISPs of the 
>> world are going to rise and unite to quash the oppressive hand of big 
>> government at their own expense in order to satisify some sense of 
>> personal ethics or customer goodwill.
>> 
>
>	I urge Mr. Bell to start a business of his own with that
>model, and see how much fun he has. (Or, worded differently, how long
>it takes for him to go bankrupt. Perhaps we can setup betting
>pools. That could be fun.)

By now, you've probably seen my comment to Unicorn, that ISP's could easily 
pool their resources, in a form of insurance, to guarantee that any test 
case will be fully litigated to ensure that a bad precedent isn't set.  What 
if it cost a million dollars?  That's only about 5 cents per American 
Internet user.

You were saying about "going bankrupt"?

Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com






Thread