1996-09-26 - Re: Cuba, Iraq, AP…

Header Data

From: Phil Fraering <pgf@acadian.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2939e6cf68161551d17f32832595002113bf0340b4a6cd6c2acdeb1244a80054
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960926090237.25731A-100000@stiletto.acadian.net>
Reply To: <199609260356.WAA00453@smoke.suba.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-09-26 17:47:19 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 01:47:19 +0800

Raw message

From: Phil Fraering <pgf@acadian.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 01:47:19 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Cuba, Iraq, AP...
In-Reply-To: <199609260356.WAA00453@smoke.suba.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.93.960926090237.25731A-100000@stiletto.acadian.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


On Wed, 25 Sep 1996, snow wrote:

>      Some would say that 1) Saddam (as a problem) was _created_ by the US, 
> and it would not be in the interest of certain people to have him die.
> Along the same lines, Castro, while not exactly friendly (and who can blame 
> him) to the US, is also not a threat, and never really has been. Killing 
> him would serve no purpose.

Shortly after the Gulf War elements in the Iraqi military tried to
overthrow Hussein; they apparently tried to co-ordinate with the U.S., who
tried to co-ordinate with Saudi Arabia, who warned Saddam that there was
going to be a coup attempt; gotta stop that Ol' power vaccuum...

The fact that the people who performed the Bay of Pigs were enticed into
it by promised but withdrawn U.S. military support is a matter of public
record; would Castro still be in power had the United States not 
(intentionally? I don't know) destroyed the core resistance against him
in that fashion?


Phil Fraering          The above is the opinion of neither my internet
pgf@acadian.net        service provider nor my employer.
318/261-9649               






Thread