From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: “E. ALLEN SMITH” <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Message Hash: 5f0c1ccc26c9f42944d821df5fafcb920f94e55318a1b0864f694e5e0c89135f
Message ID: <m0tof8q-0008xmC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-20 01:55:00 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 09:55:00 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 1996 09:55:00 +0800
To: "E. ALLEN SMITH" <EALLENSMITH@ocelot.Rutgers.EDU>
Subject: Re: Easy Nuclear Detonator
Message-ID: <m0tof8q-0008xmC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 12:14 PM 2/19/96 EDT, E. ALLEN SMITH wrote:
> I would have appreciated it if you'd sent this to me privately, or at
>least didn't enclose my message to you (which was sent in private email). Among
>other reasons, it is rather off-topic (unless one wants to count it among bomb
>information available on the net).
> -Allen
Uh, okay, sorry. See, I wrote the response for you, and at the last minute
I realized that I might as well include it to the list as well. Yes, it is
"off topic" but I thought it was interesting reading anyway. In addition, I
gave the list 12+ hours of "warning" and asked if anybody objected... All I
got was an "attaboy" from Dr. Dmitri Vulis.
As for the inclusion of your private note: sorry again. But at the time,
it just didn't occur to me that you'd object to this. "Nettiquette" is new
to me.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com.
Return to February 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”