From: abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
To: jimbell@pacifier.com
Message Hash: 4f179b777e9cb08e5333248efce46898b46ef12447689d167d2f5ab91b9d3be6
Message ID: <Yxaex8m9LksY085yn@netcom.com>
Reply To: <m0uAnQG-0008yqC@pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-04-21 09:50:51 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 17:50:51 +0800
From: abostick@netcom.com (Alan Bostick)
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 1996 17:50:51 +0800
To: jimbell@pacifier.com
Subject: [Yadda Yadda] Re: OS/2 encryption utilities
In-Reply-To: <m0uAnQG-0008yqC@pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Yxaex8m9LksY085yn@netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
In article <m0uAnQG-0008yqC@pacifier.com>,
jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com> wrote:
> At 06:08 PM 4/20/96 -0400, Black Unicorn wrote:
> >On Sat, 20 Apr 1996 mirele@xmission.com wrote:
> >
> >> Due to the fact that I have been threatened by the Church of Scientology
> >> with legal action if I do not cease and desist posting encheferated
> >> parodies of their secret scripture (per a letter I received from Cult
> >> attorneys via Federal Express today) I am in search of OS/2 disk
> >> encryption programs.
> >
> >Were I a Co$ attorney, I would use this to bring discovery violations
> >if I took you to court.
>
> You know, I've always thought it odd how some people misuse the English
> language when they speak in their chosen shorthand. "bring discovery
> violations"? How, exactly, does one _BRING_ a "discovery violation"?
> Like, maybe, bring it in a whellbarrow?!? Is "bring" a proper word in this
> context? Why not stop using that silly shorthand.
>
> BTW, you seem to have forgotten that this would be an excellent way to deter
> the kind of "knock and smash" warrant service common amongst government
> thugs. Any argument by the cops that "we must break down the door or else
> they'll erase the data!" is rendered obviously silly if the data is ALREADY
> encrypted and inaccessible. If anything, it would make the data permanently
> inaccessible since it would make (arguably) the release of a decrypt key
> "incriminating" if it were a criminal case.
>
> Yet another excellent reason to encrypt the data is that it deters
> burglaries, where the purpose of the burglary is to get this data illegally.
> Given the COS's history, that is a reasonable fear.
>
> Jim Bell
>
> jimbell@pacifier.com
>
subscribe clueless jimbell@pacifier.com
- --
Alan Bostick | They say in online country there is no middle way
mailto:abostick@netcom.com | You'll either be a Usenet man or a thug for the CDA
news:alt.grelb | Simon Spero (after Tom Glazer)
http://www.alumni.caltech.edu/~abostick
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQB1AwUBMXmsmuVevBgtmhnpAQG6IAL+LUJpn1C056Hff6wmmwhHVfSWiy1d9PUy
gYtM0IceT8q7xDmRTph4Nfh6Vel+QzjrlPSunpHlmHe/tvPp7asmp3ci1Pkoecp1
w1cvcc0nxs/LsWjJoDxoNmmlUHsug+z5
=rQ+d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to April 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”