From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: “Steven Seyffert” <bryce@digicash.com>
Message Hash: ef07a9ee9b9d47db532fd41d79135e9b8870dae29bab4fdb519984f069a8ded8
Message ID: <199607160519.WAA13505@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-16 13:01:23 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 21:01:23 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 1996 21:01:23 +0800
To: "Steven Seyffert" <bryce@digicash.com>
Subject: Re: #E-CASH: PRODUCT OR SERVICE?
Message-ID: <199607160519.WAA13505@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 01:48 AM 7/16/96 +0200, Steven Seyffert wrote:
>
>----------
>: From: bryce@digicash.com
>: To: David G.W. Birch <daveb@hyperion.co.uk>
>: Cc: Multiple recipients of <e$@thumper.vmeng.com>; cypherpunks@toad.com
>: Subject: Re: #E-CASH: PRODUCT OR SERVICE?
>: Date: maandag 15 juli 1996 15:36
>
>: 4. Privacy. The privacy of Ecash(tm) payers is mathematically
>: unconditional.
>:
>Just like the privacy of e-mail and the independance of the WWW once was.
>
Notice he says there's PAYER privacy. Payee privacy is possible, but not
implemented by Digicash. Payee privacy is going to be a feature of a
SUCCESSFUL digital cash system.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to July 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-07-16 (Tue, 16 Jul 1996 21:01:23 +0800) - Re: #E-CASH: PRODUCT OR SERVICE? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>