1996-10-04 - Re: Clipper spin [was Re:Flood Warning]

Header Data

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: Jim McCoy <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 0ceeba8907fa44a268c8c05a3fd5c336719e95be0125b50fd9b567fd41125787
Message ID: <199610032304.QAA20608@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-10-04 03:51:21 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 11:51:21 +0800

Raw message

From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 1996 11:51:21 +0800
To: Jim McCoy <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Clipper spin [was Re:Flood Warning]
Message-ID: <199610032304.QAA20608@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


At 12:00 PM 10/3/96 -0800, Jim McCoy wrote:
>[...]
>>
>>   High-Tech Leaders Join Forces to Enable International
>>   Strong Encryption
>>
>>      See: http://www.ibm.com/news/alliance2.htm
>
>The "International Strong Encryption" phrase is something that we
>need to become active in stopping.  Anything which responds to such
>announcements should put a different spin on this phrase.  If the
>Clipper farce is accepted as "strong" encryption then the battle is
>lost; maybe something like "it is _international_ strong encryption
>because it is the strongest encryption people like Saddam Hussein [insert
>bogeyman du jour] want Americans to have access to"

Idea 1:  It should be called "International Weakened Encryption."

Idea 2:  The "alliance" term above in the URL should be replaced with "Axis."
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com





Thread