From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: dd247df3298da811e1c253bcaf54be8d77bd659c180f5149a1bd44faa3afec21
Message ID: <m0tjFiu-0008zmC@pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-02-05 03:23:28 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 11:23:28 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Feb 1996 11:23:28 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Our "New Order"
Message-ID: <m0tjFiu-0008zmC@pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:26 PM 2/4/96 GMT, Mutatis Mutantdis wrote:
>On Sat, 3 Feb 1996 11:30:48 -0700, David M. Rose wrote:
>
>>In view of the fact that our government seems bent on abrogating its
>>citizens' rights to free speech, has anyone done a survey indicating which
>>foreign countries have the best Net connections to the U.S. (excepting, of
>>course, Germany and possibly France)?
>
>>It may be expedient for Planned Parenthood and others whose points of view
>>differ somewhat from those approved under our "New Order"* to explore
>>alternatives in order to reach their constituencies.
>
>The law makes anyone accessing material lable... even if you connect
>to a foreign site where it's legal there, if it's banned in the US,
>you can still get screwed (in theory).
>
>Methinks the time is right for a "PGPScape" web browser.
>
>Rob.
Let me see if I understand this concept correctly. The remote site would
pre-encrypt the transmitted data, so that when received it could be
decrypted by the requestor according to his (or a temporarily chosen, to
avoid disclosing the actual recipient.) public key, so as to disguise both
the material and perhaps also the actual requestor?
Excellent idea!
Return to February 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-02-05 (Mon, 5 Feb 1996 11:23:28 +0800) - Re: Our “New Order” - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>