From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Message Hash: e5941944ba38f4901643dcc5d32c1da6f978ad7633fe15ef47955cfbabcf3a75
Message ID: <199607131310.GAA14552@mail.pacifier.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1996-07-13 17:13:17 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 01:13:17 +0800
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 1996 01:13:17 +0800
To: froomkin@law.miami.edu>
Subject: Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR?
Message-ID: <199607131310.GAA14552@mail.pacifier.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:27 PM 7/12/96 -0700, Bill Frantz wrote:
>At 9:21 PM 7/12/96 -0400, Michael Froomkin wrote:
>>> could claim that MIT came very close to violating ITAR, but the same claim
>>
>>"The ITAR do not apply to books"
>
>I'm not sure the exact legalities apply here. I think it is more like the
>mob pressuring business men for protection and punishing those who do not
>comply.
And that's what "our" government's coming to! Does anybody still think that
they're not going to deserve what they get?
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to July 1996
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1996-07-13 (Sun, 14 Jul 1996 01:13:17 +0800) - Re: Can the inevitability of Software privacy be used to defeat the ITAR? - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>