From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
To: “Mark M.” <cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: b845d0858e37c266dbdfe89744f7c16b58c221fe475ca0aae45107abe8fa8258
Message ID: <199701270110.RAA00824@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-01-27 01:10:50 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 17:10:50 -0800 (PST)
From: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 17:10:50 -0800 (PST)
To: "Mark M." <cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Cellular location...
Message-ID: <199701270110.RAA00824@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 07:54 PM 1/25/97 -0500, Mark M. wrote:
>I wonder how expensive it would be to put a GPS receiver in a cell phone and
>have the option to transmit the coordinates on a separate channel. There
>would be little difference between this and forcing cell phone companies to
>triangulate every call. The primary motivation for this is almost certainly
>"location escrow" to make it easier for the feds to track drug dealers.
It would only be marginally reliable. GPS signals are so weak (coming from
satellites in 11,000 mile orbits) that reception outdoors is sometimes iffy
if the signals have to go through foliage. Reception indoors is probably
only rarely do-able.
Jim Bell
jimbell@pacifier.com
Return to January 1997
Return to “jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>”
1997-01-27 (Sun, 26 Jan 1997 17:10:50 -0800 (PST)) - Re: Cellular location… - jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>