1996-08-11 - Re: Massively parallel carbon-unit-based voice pattern matching

Header Data

From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Message Hash: b3e9fbcef2a14b0031c304eeb3cd2e98200a37f36b4eaaf35021d1231a1b293d
Message ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960811185455.24521B-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Reply To: <199608092330.QAA26402@mail.pacifier.com>
UTC Datetime: 1996-08-11 21:14:24 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 05:14:24 +0800

Raw message

From: Rabid Wombat <wombat@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 1996 05:14:24 +0800
To: jim bell <jimbell@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: Massively parallel carbon-unit-based voice pattern matching
In-Reply-To: <199608092330.QAA26402@mail.pacifier.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960811185455.24521B-100000@mcfeely.bsfs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


> 
> In other words, could somebody fake a bomb threat using a recording which 
> has been processed to sound "exactly" like some famous person whose voice 
> you can analyze?  
> 

In theory, yes; with digitized sound, anything is "possible."

However, in practice, it isn't all that different from altering digitized 
photos. In theory, a "perfect" false image could be produced, but in 
practice, subtle errors are detectable. Once you've detected that 
alteration has occurred, the information is suspect, and the 
perpetrator has added clues as to his/her identity.

-r.w.






Thread